|
課程名稱 |
當代都市理論
Contemporary Urban Theories |
|
開課學期 |
107-1 |
|
授課對象 |
工學院 建築與城鄉研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
王志弘 |
|
課號 |
BP7201 |
|
課程識別碼 |
544 M4820 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
3.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
選修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期四A,B,C(18:25~21:05) |
|
上課地點 |
工綜305 |
|
備註 |
限碩士班以上
總人數上限：20人
外系人數限制：2人 |
|
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1071BP7201_urban |
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
都市是當代多數人類生活的首要環境，也經常被視為人類問題的根源，又是解答之所繫。我們應該如何理解都市、分析城市，擘劃及創造更好的都市生活環境，是學術界和實務界的重大任務。十九世紀末，出於對貧窮、擁擠和公衛的關切，興起了都市調查與規劃倡議。廿世紀初期芝加哥大學的都市社會學派，開啟了都市民族誌和人類生態學的雙傳統。1970至1980年代的新都市社會學（包括新韋伯派和新馬克思主義）現身，加以女性主義觀點、文化轉向、全球城市論，還有深受列斐伏爾觀點影響的空間生產和空間修補概念，西方都市研究已累積了漫長且多樣的傳承。然而，2000年代以後，仍有許多新的都市研究視角迸發，展現出人類都市經驗的持續進展，促使學界不斷創新理論和概念以利掌握變化。
本課程旨在介紹晚近國際學界有關都市性質及分析取徑的新觀點，包括行星都市論（planetary urbanism）、拼裝都市論（assemblage urbanism）、後殖民都市論（postcolonial urbanism）、尋常城市（ordinary cities）與小城市（small cities）研究、南方城市（global south cities）研究，以及比較都市論（comparative urbanism）等。這些不同取徑和觀點之間的辯論與整合，也是課程研討的焦點。
|
|
課程目標 |
本課程目標在於令修課者（一）.掌握當代都市理論的重要流派、概念和辯論；（二）通過閱讀、報告、討論和實際課題研究，學習運用既有理論概念來探討當代都市議題；（三）通過實際都市議題的經驗研究，摸索與既有理論取向對話的可能性。 |
|
課程要求 |
■課程要求：
盡力閱讀課程材料，勇於發問，勤於出席。修習者的投入與表現，對本課程能否順利運作非常重要。本課程採取講演和討論課（seminar）並行方式，每次上課由教師講授和提示重點，並由參與者分配導讀該週的閱讀材料，每篇文章報告時間，必須控制於十五分鐘，盡量留時間發問和討論，探討能跟理論概念對話的經驗議題。報告者必須分發書面提要（必須包含三百字以內之摘述，主要論點和論證邏輯之說明【配合論證圖示】，以及評論和問題）。
沒有分配到當週閱讀材料導讀的同學，則需繳交針對某一篇或全部閱讀材料的讀書心得和提問，至少一頁。旁聽的同學，不需分配閱讀材料的導讀，也不必繳交作業，但是必須每堂課繳交讀書心得和提問。
本課程的設計份量，需要修課者在課堂外花費五倍以上的時間，也就是3 X 4＝12個小時，包括閱讀教材、與同學討論、撰寫摘要或讀書心得及提問的時間。
■摘要寫作要點：
書面摘要必須於首頁列明報告文獻（APA格式）、日期、報告人，先有三百字摘要，述明整篇文章的問題意識和主要論點。然後是經過消化的、條理分明的內容概述。換言之，不宜逐段摘譯，最好是整理出文中討論的主要問題，以及作者對這些問題的回答或爭辯，建議以圖表方式整理出主要的論證架構，也可以搭配一些圖片，譬如說作者照片、書影或文中提到的人物和事件圖片。如果直接引述文中語句或段落，必須以不同字體清楚標示，並加註頁碼。最後，必須針對文獻內容提出問題，或是可供延伸討論的經驗議題。
■作業要求與評分：
1.書評：針對與本課程主題有關之專書或一系列相關論文，撰寫3000至5000字之書評。本作業佔15%。須先與授課教師討論所欲評論之專書或系列文章。
2.期末報告：運用本課程提到的都市研究取向和概念，研究特定都市議題，可以是經驗性課題，也可以是理論性探討。這份報告將分為三個階段繳交。第一階段是提出研究計畫書，針對研究主題提出初步觀察、提問，以及初步文獻回顧和方法說明（3頁以內）。第二階段是已經完成田野或案例考察及初步分析的初稿，至少一萬字。第三階段是完稿，也就是經過教師批閱和建議，提出完整分析的修正稿，一萬五千字左右。論文寫作必須符合學術規範，包含中英文標題、中文摘要與關鍵詞，以及符合學術規範之書目格式（參考《台灣社會學刊》或《建築與城鄉研究學報》等學術期刊的格式）。每階段分別佔學期成績的5%、20%、10%，合計為35%。
3.平時表現（含出席狀況、參與討論、口頭報告和書面摘要表現等），佔50 %。
4.各項報告須準時繳交，遲交一天將扣3分，但以扣除30分為上限；期末報告完稿不得遲交。繳交時間明定於各週進度表。
|
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
另約時間 |
|
指定閱讀 |
各週主題與進度
□閱讀材料份量將視修課人數與狀況彈性調整。有*號之閱讀材料置於課程網頁，其餘材料請自行準備。
第一週 課程介紹：如何理解當代都市 9/13
■閱讀材料
1.廖昱凱、曾于珊（2018）〈行星都市化（planetary urbanization）：當整顆地球成為一個都市？〉，地理眼。https://www.geog-daily.org/geogconcepts/planetary-urbanization。
2.廖昱凱、曾于珊（2018）〈對西方都市經驗普遍化的抨擊：後殖民主義下的都市研究〉，地理眼。https://www.geog-daily.org/geogconcepts/7716776。
3.廖昱凱、曾于珊（2018）〈城市作為一台拼裝車：裝配都市主義如何組裝城市？〉，地理眼。https://www.geog-daily.org/geogconcepts/3316370。
4.廖昱凱、曾于珊（2018）〈都市理論大亂鬥！「都市研究走得太遠？」都市經濟學派的批評與相關回應〉，地理眼。https://www.geog-daily.org/geogconcepts/68090811。
第二週 都市研究的發展歷程 9/20
■閱讀材料
1.Short, J. R. (2006) Theorizing the modern city. In Urban Theory: A Critical Assessment (pp. 17-41). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
2.Short, J. R. (2006) Theorizing the postmodern city. In Urban Theory: A Critical Assessment (pp. 42-57). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
3.Saunders, P. (1985). Space, the city and urban sociology. In D. Gregory and J. Urry (eds.), Social Relations and Spatial Structures. (pp. 67-89). New York: St. Martin's Press.(有王志弘中譯)*
4.張景森（1988）〈戰後台灣都市研究的主流範型：一個初步的回顧〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》。1(2-3): 9-31.*
5.蘇碩斌（2008）〈研究人或空間：台灣都市社會研究的成立與變化〉。《人文及社會科學集刊》20(3): 397-439。*
■參考材料：都市研究、都市社會學與都市理論
1.Parker, S. (2007)《遇見都市：理論與經驗》（Urban Theory and the Urban Experience: Encountering the City）（王志弘、徐苔玲譯）。台北：群學。(有英文版檔案*)
2.Gottdiener, M. and Hutchison, R. (2011) The New Urban Sociology (4th ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.*
3.Merrifield, A. (2014) The New Urban Question. London: Pluto Press.*
4.Thorns, D. C. (2002) The Transformation of Cities: Urban Theory and Urban Life. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.*
5.Dear, M. (ed.) (2002) From Chicago to L.A.: Making Sense of Urban Theory. London: Sage.*
6.Hall, T., Hubbard, P. and Short, J.R. (eds) (2008) The SAGE Companion to the City . Los Angeles: Sage.*
7.Cooke, P. (1990) Modern urban theory in question. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS 15(3): 331-343.*
8.Koch, R. and Latham, A. (eds)(2017) Key Thinkers on Cities. London: Sage.*
9.McNeill, D. (2017) Global Cities and Urban Theory. London: Sage.*
10.Harding, A. and T. Blokland (2014) Urban Theory: A Critical Introduction to Power, Cities and Urbanism in the 21st Century. London: Sage.
第三週 都市研究的當代辯論 9/27
■閱讀材料
1.Derickson, K. (2015) Urban geography I: Locating urban theory in the ‘urban age.’ Progress in Human Geography, 39(5): 647-657.*
2.Scott, A.J. and Storper, M. (2015) The nature of cities: the scope and limits of urban theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(1): 1-15.*
3.Storper, M. and Scott, A. (2016) Current debates in urban theory: a critical assessment. Urban Studies, 53(6): 1114-1136.*
4.Duhau, E. (2016) Social sciences and urban studies: Goodbye to paradigms. International Journal of Urban and Region Research 40(1): 147-156.*
5.Mould, O. (2016) A limitless urban theory? A response to Scott and Storper’s ‘The nature of cities: the scope and limits of urban theory’. International Journal of Urban and Region Research 40(1): 157-163.*
6.Walker, R. A. (2016) Why cities? a response. International Journal of Urban and Region Research 40(1): 164-180.*
7.Robinson, J. and A. Roy. (2016) Debate on global urbanisms and the nature of urban theory. International Journal of Urban and Region Research, 40(1): 181-186.*
8.Robinson, J. (2016) Comparative urbanism: new geographies and cultures of theorizing the urban. International Journal of Urban and Region Research, 40(1): 187-199.*
9.Roy, A. (2016) Who’s afraid of postcolonial theory?. International Journal of Urban and Region Research, 40(1): 200-209.*
10.Simone, A. (2016) It’s just the city after all!, International Journal of Urban and Region Research 40(1): 210-218.*
11.Peake, L. (2016) The twenty‐first‐century quest for feminism and the global urban. International Journal of Urban and Region Research 40(1): 219-227.*
12.Leitner, H. and Sheppard, H. (2015) Provincializing critical urban theory: extending the ecosystem of possibilities. International Journal of Urban and Region Research 40(1): 228-35.*
■參考材料
1.Roy, A. (2016. What is urban about critical urban theory?. Urban Geography 37(6): 810-823.*
2.Storper, M. and Manville, M. (2006) Behaviour, preferences and cities: urban theory and urban resurgence. Urban Studies, 43(8): 1247-1274.*
3.Marcuse (2009) From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 13(2-3): 185-197.*
第四週 行星都市論（一）：概說 10/4
■閱讀材料
1.Brenner, N. and Schmid, C. (2015) Towards a new epistemology of the urban?. City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 19(2-3): 151-182.*
2.Walker, R. (2015) Building a better theory of the urban: A response to ‘Towards a new epistemology of the urban?’. City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 19(2-3): 183-91.*
3.Brenner, N. and Schmid, C. (2015) Combat, Caricature & Critique in the Study of Planetary Urbanization (Cambridge and Zurich: Urban Theory Lab + Contemporary City Institute). http://urbantheorylab.net/uploads/Brenner_Schmid_Richard%20Walker_2015.pdf.*
4.Brenner, N. (2018) Debating planetary urbanization: for an engaged pluralism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 36(3): 570-590.*
■參考材料
1.Brenner, N. (2000) The urban question: reflections on Henri Lefebvre, urban theory and the politics of scale. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(2): 361-378.*
2.Brenner, N. (2009) What is critical urban theory. City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 13 (2-3): 198-207.*
3.Brenner, N. and Schmid, C (2012) Planetary urbanization. In Gandy, M (ed.) Urban Constellations (pp. 10-13). Berlin: Jovis.
4.Brenner, N. (2013) Theses on urbanization. Public Culture 25: 85-114.*
5.Brenner, N. (2014) Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization, Berlin: Jovis.
6.Brenner, N. and Schmid, C. (2014) The ‘urban age’ in Question. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(3): 731-55.*
7.Merrifield, A (2013a) The urban question under planetary urbanization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37(3): 909-922.*
8.Merrifield, A (2013b) The Politics of Encounter: Urban Theory and Protest under Planetary Urbanization. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
9.Merrifield, A. (2011) The right to the city and beyond. City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 15 (3-4): 468-76.*
10.Madden, D. (2012) City becoming world: Nancy, Lefebvre and the global-urban imagination. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30: 772-787.*
11.Buckley, M. and Strauss, K. (2016) With, against and beyond Lefebvre: planetary urbanization and epistemic plurality. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34(4): 617-636.*
12.Millington, G. (2016) The cosmopolitan contradictions of planetary urbanization. The British Journal of Sociology, 67(3): 476-496.*
第五週 行星都市論（二）：案例 10/11
■閱讀材料
1.Arboleda, M. (2015) Financialization, totality and planetary urbanization in the Chilean Andes. Geoforum, 67: 4-13.*
2.Arboleda, M. (2016) In the nature of the non-city: expand infrastructural networks and the political ecology of planetary urbanisation. Antipode 48(2): 233-51.*
3.Fahmi, F. Z., Hudalah, D., Rahayu, P. Woltjer, J. (2014) Extended urbanization in small and medium-sized cities: The case of Cirebon, Indonesia. Habitat International 42: 1-10.*
4.Ruddick, S. (2015) Situating the anthropocene: planetary urbanization and the anthropological machine. Urban Geography, 36(8): 1113-1130.*
■參考材料
1.Arboleda, M. (2016) Space of extraction, metropolitan explosions: planetary urbanization and the commodity boom in Latin America. International Journal of Urban and Region Research 40(1): 96-112.*
2.Angelo, H. and Wachsmuth, D. (2015) Urbanizing urban political ecology: a critique of methodological cityism. International Journal of Urban and Region Research 39(1): 16-27.*
第六週 拼裝都市論（一）：概說 10/18
■閱讀材料
1.王志弘（2015）〈拼裝都市論與都市政治經濟學之辯〉。《地理研究》62：109-22。*
2.McFarlane, C. (2011) Assemblage and critical urbanism. City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 15(2): 204-224.*
3.Brenner, N., Madden, D.J. and Wachsmuth, D. (2011) Assemblage urbanism and the challenges of critical urban theory, City, 15(2): 225-240.*
4.McFarlane, C. (2011) On Context. City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 15(3-4): 375-88.*
5.Smith, R.G. and Doel, M.A. (2011) Questioning the theoretical basis of current global-city research: Structures, networks and actor-networks. International journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35: 24-39.*
■參考材料
1.Anderson, B. and C. McFarlane, C. (2011) Assemblage and geography. Area 43(2): 124-27.*
2.McFarlane, C. (2011) The city as assemblage: dwelling and urban space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29(4): 649-671.*
3.Smith, R.G. (2005) Networking the city. Geography, 90: 172-176.
4.Kamalipour, H. and Peimani, N. (2015) Assemblage thinking and the city: implications for urban studies. Current Urban Studies, 3: 402-408.*
5.Delanda, M. (2006) A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.*
6.Legg, S. (2011) Assemblage apparatus using Deleuze and Foucault. Area, 43(2): 128-133.*
第七週 拼裝都市論（二）：案例 10/25
■閱讀材料
1.McFarlane, C. (2011) Learning the City: Knowledge and Translocal Assemblage. Chicester, United Kingdom: John Wiley and Sons Ltd Press.*（選讀）
■參考材料
1.Kanai, J, Kutz, W (2013) Entreprenurial assemblages from off the map: (Trans)national designs for Tangier. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31: 80–98.
2.Ureta, S. 2014. The Shelter that Wasn’t There: On the Politics of Co-ordinating Multiple Urban Assemblages in Santiago, Chile. Urban Studies 51(2): 231-46.
3.Farías, I. and T. Bender. 2010. Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies. New York: Routledge Press.
4.Madden, D.J. (2010) Urban ANTs: a review essay. Qualitative Sociology, 33(4): 583-589.*
5.Madden, D.J. (2010) Revisiting the end of public space: assembling the public in an urban park. City & Community, 9(2): 187-207.*
6.Sassen,S. (2006) Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.*
7.Ong, A. and Collier, S.J. (eds)(2005) Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problem. Malden, MA: Blackwell.*
第八週 拼裝都市論（三）：案例 11/1
■閱讀材料
1.Blok, A. and Farías, I. (eds.) (2016) Urban Cosmopolitics: Agencements, Assemblies, Atmospheres. London: Taylor and Francis .*（選讀）
第九週 從全球城市到普通城市 11/8
■閱讀材料
1.Robinson, J. (2006) Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development. London: Routledge.*（選讀）
2.Smith, R.G. (2013) The Ordinary City Trap. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 45(10): 2290-2304.*
3.Sheppard E., Leitner, H. and Maringanti. A. (2013) Provincializing global urbanism: a manifesto, Urban Geography 34(7): 893-900.*
4.Lawhon, M., S. Jonathan, H. Ernstson and J. Pierce. 2016. Unlearning (Un)Located Ideas in the Provincialization of Urban Theory. Regional Studies, 50(9): 1611-1622.
■參考材料
1.Amin, A. and Graham, S. (1997) The ordinary city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 22(4): 411-429.*
2.McCann, E. (2004) Urban political economy beyond the ‘global city’. Urban Studies, 41(12): 2315–2333.
3.Robinson, J. (2002) Global and world cities: a view from off the map. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(3): 531-54.*
4,Robinson, J. 2005. Urban geography: world cities, or a world of cities. Progress in Human Geography, 29(6): 757-65.*
5.Smith, R.G. (2013) “Beyond the global city concept and the myth of ‘command and control’” International journal of Urban and Regional Research 38(1): 98-115.*
6.Roy, A. (2011) Urbanisms, worlding practices and the theory of planning. Planning Theory, 10(1): 6-15.*
7.Roy, A. and Ong, A. (2011) Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.*
8.Roy, A. (2009) The 21st-century metropolis: new geographies of theory. Regional Studies, 43(6): 819-830.*
9.Tulumello, S. (2015) Fear and urban planning in ordinary cties: from theory to practice. Planning Practice & Research, 30(5): 477-496.*
第十週 中小城市研究 11/15
■閱讀材料
1.Bell, D and Jayne, M. (2009) Small cities? towards a research agenda. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(3): 683-699.*
2.Myrdahl, T.M. (2013) Ordinary (small) cities and LGBQ lives. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 12 (2): 279-304.*
3.Neo, H. and Pow, C.P. (2015) The weight of small cities: development and the rural–urban nexus in Jinghong, Southwest China. The Professional Geographer, 67(4): 555-563.*
■參考材料
1.Bell, D. and Jayne, M. (eds)(2006) Small Cities: Urban Experience Beyond the Metropolis. Oxon, UK: Routledge.*
2.Connolly, J.J. (ed.) (2010) After the Factory: Reinventing America's Industrial Small Cities. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.*
第十一週 從殖民城市到後殖民城市 11/22
■閱讀材料
1.Bishop, R., Phillips, J. and Yeo, W.W. (2003) Postcolonial Urbanism: Southeast Asian Cities and Global Processes. NY: Routledge.*（選讀）
2.Roy, A. (2011) Slumdog cities: rethinking subaltern cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35: 223-238.*
3.Silver, J. (2014) Incremental infrastructures: material improvisation and social collaboration across post-colonial Accra. Urban Geography, 35(6): 788-804.*
■參考材料
1.Chakrabarty, D. (2008) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference (New Edition) .Princeton: Princeton University Press.*
第十二週 南方城市研究（一）：概說 11/29
■閱讀材料
1.McFarlane, C. (2008) Urban shadows: materiality, the ‘southern city’ and urban theory'. Geography Compass, 2(2): 340-358.*
2.Parnell, S., and Robinson, J. (2012) (Re) theorizing cities from the Global South: Looking beyond neoliberalism. Urban Geography, 33(4): 593-617.*
3.Lawhon, M., Ernstson, H., and Silver, J. (2014) Provincializing urban political ecology: Towards a situated UPE through African urbanism. Antipode, 46(2): 497-516.*
4.Watson, V (2009) Seeing from the South: Refocusing urban planning on the globe's central urban issues. Urban Studies, 46(11): 2259-2275.*
■參考材料
1.Harker, C. (2011) Theorizing the urban from the ‘South’? City: 15: 120-122.*
2.Huyssen, A. (ed.) (2008) Other Cities, Other Worlds. Durham, NC.: Duke University Press.
3.Mayaram, S, (Ed.) (2009) The Other Global City. London: Routledge.*
4.Edensor, T, and Jayne, M, (eds) (2012) Urban Theory Beyond the West. London: Routledge.*
5.Myers, G (2011) African Cities: Alternative Visions of Urban Theory and Practice. London: Zed Books.*
6.Söderström, O. (2014) Cities in Relations: Trajectories of Urban Development in Hanoi and Ouagadougou. New York: John Wiley & Sons.*
7.Parnell, S. and Oldfield, S. (eds)(2014) The Routledge Handbook on Cities of the Global South. London: Routledge.*
8.Miraftab, F. and Kudva, N. (eds.) (2015) Cities of the Global South Reader. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.*
9.Chant, S. and McIlwaine, C. (2016) Cities, Slums and Gender in the Global South: Towards a Feminised Urban Future. London, UK: Routledge.
10.Bunnell, T., Goh, D.P.S., Lai, C-K. and Pow, C.P. (2012) Introduction: global urban frontiers-Asian cities in theory, practice and imagination. Urban Studies, 49(13): 2785-2793.*
第十三週 南方城市研究（二）：案例 12/6
■閱讀材料
1.Simone, A. 2010. City Life from Jakarta to Dakar: Movements at the Crossroads. London: Routledge.*（選讀）
■參考材料
1.Simone, A. 2014. Jakarta, Drawing the City Near. Minnesota, United States: University of Minnesota Press.
第十四週 南方城市研究（三）：案例 12/13
■閱讀材料
1.Simone, A. (2010) City Life from Jakarta to Dakar: Movements at the Crossroads. London: Routledge.*（選讀）
第十五週 都市非正式性 12/20
■閱讀材料
1.Roy, A, AlSayyad, N (eds.) (2004) Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Maryland: Lexington Books.*（選讀）
2.McFarlane, C. (2012) Rethinking informality: politics, crisis and the city. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(1): 89-108.*
3.Varley, A (2013) Postcolonialising informality?. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31(1): 4-22.*
4.Chien, K.H. (2017) Entrepreneurialising urban informality: transforming governance of informal settlements in Taipei. Urban Studies, First Published October 18, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017726739.*
■參考材料
1.Kudva, N. (2009) The everyday and the episodic: the spatial and political impacts of urban informality. Environment and Planning A, 41(7): 1614 -1628.*
2.Hansen, K.T. and Vaa. M. (eds)(2004) Reconsidering Informality: Perspectives from Urban Africa. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.*
3. Roy, A. (2005) Urban informality: toward an epistemology of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2): 147-158.*
4.Vasuvedan, A (2014) The makeshift city. Progress in Human Geography 39(3): 338–359.*
5.Fischer, B., McCann, B. and Auyero, J. (eds.) (2014) Cities from Scratch: Poverty and Informality in Urban Latin America. Durham, NC.: Duke University Press.*
第十六週 比較都市論 12/27
■閱讀材料
1.陳虹穎（2016）〈空間研究方法論評介：流變中的比較都市論〉。《地理學報》83:71-90.*
2.Robinson, J. (2016) Thinking cities through elsewhere: comparative tactics for a more global urban studies. Progress in Human Geography, 40(1): 3-29.*
3.McFarlane, C. (2010) The comparative city: knowledge, learning, urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(4): 725-742.*
4.Peck, J. (2015) Cities beyond compare. Regional Studies, 49(1): 160-182.*
■參考材料
1.Robinson, J. (2011) Cities in a world of cities: the comparative gesture. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(1): 1-23.*
2.Ward, K. (2010) Towards a relational comparative approach to the study of cities. Progress in Human Geography, 34(4): 471-487.*
3.Percival, T. and Waley, P. (2012) Articulating intra-Asian urbanism: the production of satellite cities in Phnom Penh. Urban Studies, 49(13): 2873-2888.*
4.McCann, E and Ward, K. (eds.) (2011) Mobile Urbanism: Cities and Policymaking in the Global Age. Minneapolis, MN.: University of Minnesota Press.*
5.Peck, J. and Theodore, N. (2015) Fast Policy: Experimental Statecraft at the Thresholds of Neoliberalism. Minneapolis, MN.: University of Minnesota Press.*
6.Wood, A.M. (2014) Domesticating urban theory: US concepts, British cities and the limits of cross-national applications. Urban Studies, 41(11): 2103-2118.*
7.Chen, X and Kanna, A. (2012) Rethinking Global Urbanism: Comparative Insights from Secondary Cities. London: Routledge.
第十七週 垂直都市論；差速轉譯都市論 1/3
■閱讀材料
1.Harris, A. (2015) Vertical urbanisms: opening up geographies of the three-dimensional city. Progress in Human Geography, 39(5): 601-620.*
2.王志弘（2015）〈城市作為翻譯政治的場域：理論性的探索〉。《城市學學刊》6(1): 1-28。*
3.Cronin, M. and Simon, S. (2014) Introduction: the city as translation zone. Translation Studies, 7(2): 119-132.*
第十八週 期末報告發表會 1/10
■修課同學準備十五分鐘以內的簡報檔，報告期末作業，並繳交期末報告完稿。
|
|
參考書目 |
■主要教材與參考書（其餘資料見各週進度）。
Brenner, N. (2014) Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization. Berlin: Jovis.
Merrifield, A. (2013) The Politics of the Encounter: Urban Theory and Protest under Planetary Urbanization. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Blok, A. and Farías, I. (2016) Urban Cosmopolitics: Agencements, Assemblies, Atmospheres. London: Taylor and Francis.
Farías, I. and Bender, T. (2010) Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies. New York: Routledge.
McFarlane, C. (2011) Learning the City: Knowledge and Translocal Assemblage. Chicester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
Robinson, J. (2006) Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development. London: Routledge.
Chen, X and Kanna, A. (2012) Rethinking Global Urbanism: Comparative Insights from Secondary Cities. London: Routledge.
Roy, A. and Ong, A. (2011) Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global. Malden, MA: John Wiley and Sons.
Bishop, R., Phillips, J. and Yeo, W.W. (2003) Postcolonial Urbanism: Southeast Asian Cities and Global Processes. NY: Routledge.
Edensor, T, Jayne, M, (eds). (2012) Urban Theory Beyond the West. Routledge: London.
Miraftab, F. and Kudva, N. (eds.). (2015) Cities of the Global South Reader. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Simone, A. (2010) City Life from Jakarta to Dakar: Movements at the Crossroads. London: Routledge.
Roy, A, AlSayyad, N (Eds.). (2004) Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Maryland: Lexington Books.
|
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
|
1. |
書評 |
15% |
針對與本課程主題有關之專書或一系列相關論文，撰寫3000至5000字之書評。本作業佔15%。須先與授課教師討論所欲評論之專書或系列文章。 |
2. |
期末報告 |
35% |
運用本課程提到的都市研究取向和概念，研究特定都市議題，可以是經驗性課題，也可以是理論性探討。這份報告將分為三個階段繳交。第一階段是提出研究計畫書，針對研究主題提出初步觀察、提問，以及初步文獻回顧和方法說明（3頁以內）。第二階段是已經完成田野或案例考察及初步分析的初稿，至少一萬字。第三階段是完稿，也就是經過教師批閱和建議，提出完整分析的修正稿，一萬五千字左右。論文寫作必須符合學術規範，包含中英文標題、中文摘要與關鍵詞，以及符合學術規範之書目格式（參考《台灣社會學刊》或《建築與城鄉研究學報》等學術期刊的格式）。每階段分別佔學期成績的5%、20%、10%，合計為35%。 |
3. |
平時表現 |
50% |
平時表現（含出席狀況、參與討論、口頭報告和書面摘要表現等），佔50 %。 |
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
9/13 |
課程介紹：如何理解當代都市？ |
|
第2週 |
9/20 |
都市研究的發展歷程 |
|
第3週 |
9/27 |
都市研究的當代辯論 |
|
第4週 |
10/04 |
行星都市論（一）：概說 |
|
第5週 |
10/11 |
行星都市論（二）：案例 |
|
第6週 |
10/18 |
拼裝都市論（一）：概說 |
|
第7週 |
10/25 |
拼裝都市論（二）：案例 |
|
第8週 |
11/01 |
拼裝都市論（三）：案例 |
|
第9週 |
11/08 |
從全球城市到普通城市 |
|
第10週 |
11/15 |
中小城市研究 |
|
第11週 |
11/22 |
從殖民城市到後殖民城市 |
|
第12週 |
11/29 |
南方城市研究（一）：概說 |
|
第13週 |
12/06 |
南方城市研究（二）：案例 |
|
第14週 |
12/13 |
南方城市研究（三）：案例 |
|
第15週 |
12/20 |
都市非正式性 |
|
第16週 |
12/27 |
比較都市論 |
|
第17週 |
1/03 |
垂直都市論；差速轉譯都市論 |
|
第18週 |
1/10 |
期末報告發表會（配合PPT簡報） |
|